An Examination of Trevor Timmins’ Drafting

Trevor Timmins – The Montreal Canadiens Director of Amateur Scouting

The NHL Entry Draft is just around the corner. Although the Montreal Canadiens don’t own a bevy of picks like last year, it’s still an exciting time. Trevor Timmins and the rest of the scouting staff will have just six picks in this year’s draft. Timmins, the Canadiens Director of Amateur Scouting, is considered to be one of the best in the business. Since 2003 (Timmins’ first draft with the organization), they have drafted 82 players in total, including the likes of Carey Price, Ryan McDonagh, Max Pacioretty, P.K. Subban, Brendan Gallagher, and Alex Galchenyuk. So what makes Timmins so good? First this article will examine his tendencies on draft day and then look at how his success compares to the rest of the league.


Breakdown by Size:

Timmins' Selections by Height

Timmins’ Selections by Height

Interestingly enough, since 2003, the Canadiens have drafted more players 6’1″ and over than under (46 versus 36). The tallest player is Jason Missiaen (2008), listed at 6’8″. Jarred Tinordi (2010) and Michael McCarron (2013) are tied for the next tallest players at 6’6″. The smallest player is current Canadien Brendan Gallagher (2010), standing at 5’8″. After a fairly typical 2012 draft with most players being average-sized, 2013 was the opposite. Not only did they snag three tall players (McCarron 6’6″, de la Rose 6’3″, Crisp 6’4″), but they also picked up two undersized players (Sven Andrighetto 5’10”, Martin Reway 5’10”).

Timmins' Selections by Weight

Timmins’ Selections by Weight

The selections by weight are pretty much what’s expected. Most players sit between 181 and 210 lbs, fairly standard weights. There are some very slight players, with the lightest being the retired Patrick Johnson (2008).


Breakdown by League:

The below shows the amount of players drafted from a specific league. It goes by where the player spent the majority of the season. If a player spent the same amount of time in two leagues in his draft year, then it goes by the league that the player finished the season in. Players like Jarred Tinordi and Michael McCarron are counted under the USDP, not under the USHL or NAHL, because the USDP plays a variety of exhibition matches against NCAA teams and international games on top of USHL games (previously, NAHL games).

Timmins' Selections by League

Timmins’ Selections by League

It’s clear that Timmins and the rest of the staff favour Canadian Hockey League players, especially those from the QMJHL. Despite having three different general managers through his time in the organization, this trend remains fairly consistent. Eight of the 19 QMJHLers have been drafted in the past four years, peaking with the quartet of Zach Fucale, Sven Andrighetto, Martin Reway, and Jeremy Grégoire last draft. The OHL sits second with ten, despite four consecutive drafts (2008-2011) where not a single one was selected. The WHL and USHS are tied for third place with nine picks. Besides David Fischer (2006) and Ryan McDonagh (2007), Timmins favours the high school players later in draft, with seven of them selected in rounds three or later. Since Marc Bergevin took over, only players from the CHL, USDP, SHL (formerly, SEL), Allsvenskan, and Liiga (formerly, SM-Liiga) have been drafted. In fact, Timmins hasn’t drafted from Russia since 2009, Czech Republic since 2011, Slovakia since 2005, and Switzerland since 2004. Additionally, Timmins hasn’t selected anyone directly from the USHL since Louis Leblanc and Mike Cichy in 2009.

The CHL favouritism goes beyond draft day. The last five first round picks all played in junior hockey at some point. Louis Leblanc, Michael McCarron, and Jarred Tinordi all played a season or two in junior hockey after being committed to an NCAA program. Although it appeared to the right choice for Tinordi, it’s still up in the air for Leblanc and McCarron.


Breakdown by Nationality:

Timmins' Selections by Nationality

Timmins’ Selections by Nationality

Unsurprisingly, Canadians are far and away the largest number of draftees. Americans are second, with Swedes being a distance third. The Habs haven’t drafted a Russian player since 2009. Timmins has selected three Swiss players, with two of them becoming NHLers. Swiss defenceman Mark Streit leads all Timmins selections in points with 332 and games with 573. The second Swiss player is Yannick Weber, a veteran of 164 games, while the most recent is Sven Andrighetto, one of the organization’s best prospects and the Hamilton Bulldogs’ top forward. Despite the tremendous turnout from Swiss players (in a small sample size), Timmins’ best success rate lies in Belarus. All three Belarusian players that Timmins has drafted have played over 300 games and amassed over 150 points. Andrei Kostitsyn, Sergei Kostitsyn, and Mikhail Grabovski make up the trio, all drafted between 2003-2005. Despite a solid Czech presence on the Canadiens over the years, including Tomas Plekanec, Roman Hamrlík, Robert Lang, Radek Bonk, Tomas Kaberle, and Jaroslav Spacek, Timmins has selected just one Czech player–Daniel Pribyl in 2011.


Breakdown by Position:

Timmins' Selections by Position

Timmins’ Selections by Position

Forwards are heavily favoured over goaltenders and defencemen, which is the norm. 29 of Timmins’ selections are wingers, the most of any position. Timmins has drafted just six goaltenders. Carey Price and Jaroslav Halak are the two most successful names, with Zach Fucale looking like he could be an NHL starter one day. In the 2013 draft, not a single defenceman was selected, one of three times in organization history (1967 and 2008). In 2012, just one was selected. Depending on how the chips fall, it very well could be a defence-heavy draft akin to 2011. Additionally, the Habs didn’t draft a true centreman last year. Jacob de la Rose could be that player, but he spent the last two years playing almost exclusively on the wing. Excluding de la Rose, the organization is devoid of centres at both the professional and major junior levels. Expect a centre or two to be drafted as well.


How successful has Timmins been since 2003? Well, it’s still far too early to give a definitive answer, but at this stage he appears to be doing a tremendous job.

Timmins' Selections by Round

Timmins’ Selections by Round

As shown above, Timmins hasn’t had an inordinate amount of first and second round picks to work with. He’s only had multiple first round picks once, where he hit a grand slam, picking Ryan McDonagh and Max Pacioretty. Timmins had five second round picks between the past two draft; however, this year, he has none. Through his 11 drafts, he’s averaged exactly seven picks per year (excluding the defunct eighth and ninth rounds). He hasn’t had an abundance of draft picks to work with, which makes his success even more impressive.

In Timmins’ first five drafts, he drafted extremely well. His success rate between 2003-2007 is a tremendous 41.5%. After that, it’s still up in the air, but from what can be fairly evaluated now, Timmins is fantastic at drafting talent. Only the first five drafts are taken into consideration because it’s entirely possible that a player from 2008 makes an “impact” (100+ NHL GP) in the NHL, such as Danny Kristo.

Timmins' Success Rate Between 2003-2007

Timmins’ Success Rate Between 2003-2007

Timmins not only scooped up five NHLers in the first round, but two in the ninth round (which no longer exists). Despite the massive miss in David Fischer, Timmins still has done extremely well in the first round. Andrei Kostitsyn and Kyle Chipchura have carved out very respectful NHL careers, while Ryan McDonagh, Max Pacioretty, and Carey Price are among the league’s best at their respective positions. Later in the draft, Timmins still unearthed great players, including one the league’s elite defenceman in P.K. Subban, as well as Mikhail Grabovski (2004), Sergei Kostitsyn (2005), Guilluame Latendresse (2005), and Mark Streit (2005) to name a few.

In recent years, Timmins has taken Alex Galchenyuk (2013), who was a risky pick but appears to be on track to becoming a star player, and Brendan Gallagher in the fifth round of 2010. Nathan Beaulieu and Jarred Tinordi–a pair of first round picks–both appear to be on their to becoming full-time NHLers. Despite just one top pick, Trevor Timmins seems to have done quite well in recent years. Of course, the jury is still out.

Timmins also surely had a part in the acquisitions of Greg Pateryn and Michaël Bourinval. Pateryn was the Bulldogs best defenceman this past season and appears close to being NHL-ready. Bournival, after a solid rookie campaign with the Bulldogs, made the jump to the NHL. Bournival posted 14 points in 60 games, and was a good two-way player for the Canadiens from start to finish.


How does this success compare to the rest of the league?

The below table compares the amount of games played in the NHL by every team’s draft choices beginning at the 2003 NHL Entry Draft up to the 2013 Draft.

Best Drafting Teams Since 2003 by Games Played

Best Drafting Teams Since 2003 by Games Played

Trevor Timmins and his scouting staff are first, with 6078 games. San Jose is second, followed by Chicago and Columbus. Not-so-surprisingly, Calgary is dead last with 2628 games. Surprisingly, Tampa Bay is second last; however, that can probably be explained by the fact that before Steven Stamkos (2008), the pick who played the second most NHL games was Nick Tarnasky. Hamilton Bulldogs forward, Nick Tarnasky. Detroit, a team noted for their drafting excellence are fourth from the bottom, partly due to the amount of time that all of their prospects spend in the AHL.

Next, is the same table sorted by points.

Best Drafting Teams Since 2003 by Points

Best Drafting Teams Since 2003 by Points

This time, Montreal sits tenth. It’s not first place, but still impressive. Sidney Crosby and Evgeni Malkin have carried Pittsburgh all the way to the top. Meanwhile, Calgary sits dead last again, largely due to the fact that their two highest scoring draftees are Dion Phaneuf and Mikael Backlund. Tampa Bay sits second last, while Detroit and Toronto hold the third-worst and fourth-worst spots, respectively. Boston sits second, largely thanks to their incredible 2006 draft and the Toronto Maple Leafs.

However, there are flaws with these numbers. This measures strictly games played and points, which doesn’t take into consideration how many of those games were played and how many of those points were scored by meaningful NHLers. However, there is a way to figure those out.

The below is a table comparing the number of picks that played at least one game in the NHL and how many of those players turn out to be “impact” players. In this scenario, an “impact” player is defined by having 200+ NHL games played. Goaltenders have to have been a starter for a minimum of two seasons. Goons like B.J. Crombeen and journeyman players such as Ryan O’Byrne and Anthony Stewart are excluded from “impact” consideration. In order to avoid excluding young players that are solid NHLers, players under the age of 24 (or have three full seasons of NHL seasons or less) are given a set of special requirements. All young players must have at least 40 games played. Forwards have to either produce at 0.50 point-per-game rate, and/or have a 40+ point season. Defencemen are 0.20 points-per-game and goaltenders must have appeared in at least 41 games in a season.

Best Drafting Teams Since 2003 by Picks that became "Impact" Players

Best Drafting Teams Since 2003 by Picks that became “Impact” Players

Despite sitting 17th for most picks that have at least one NHL game, Montreal comes out on top for most “impact” players, with 15. Nashville is right behind Montreal with 14 players. Calgary and Tampa Bay continue their dogfight for last place, while Toronto comes in much higher than in the previous two charts.

Finally, here’s the percentage of picks who have played at least one NHL game and went on to become “impact” players, which is under the header “C”. Once again, goons and journeymen are excluded and the same set of requirements are used.

Best Drafting Teams Since 2003 by Percentage

Best Drafting Teams Since 2003 by Percentage

Once again, Montreal comes out ahead with an impressive 50%, more than five percent more than second place Washington. Ottawa, Nashville, and surprisingly, Toronto, round out the top five. Toronto, despite being 24th and 27th in the first two tables, winds up near the top.  Once again, Calgary and Tampa Bay sit in the final two spots.

Like the first two tables, it still has its flaws. Very much like the art of drafting, this isn’t an exact science. It’s not perfect, but it does give a good overview to which teams excel at the draft.

It’s clear that the Montreal Canadiens, led by Trevor Timmins, are one of the best drafting teams in the NHL. Like every scout, Timmins has his fair share of misses; however, he also has hit numerous home runs. With just six picks in this year’s draft–the highest being 26th overall–chances are it won’t be a roster-defining draft. But the great thing about Timmins and the rest of the scouting department is that it’s not out of the realm of possibilities.

Share Button

15 Responses to An Examination of Trevor Timmins’ Drafting

  1. Couple of things to note here.

    1. You speak of organizational records over the period since 2003. Understand that there’s tremendous turnover in organizations. EG: You list the Hawks record but Mark Kelley came aboard as their scouting pt man in 08 or so, was in Pitt.. Significant turnover in Dallas, LA, Buff. Never mind Atl/Winn mess. Boston’s draft record wasn’t the best and Buffalo’s was … until Jim Benning jumped. Gordie Clark went from the Isles to Rangers. It would be a better reading if you had attached the record of scouting directors over period of tenure–Timmins was one of the more long-standing ones. Conte in NJ predates him, maybe Ross Mahoney and a couple of others.

    2. The hiring of Shane Churla makes Habs drafts going forward somewhat less than Timmins’s own.

    3. The matter of nationality is often driven not by scouting director but rather the GM. Some won’t touch a Russian no matter what the staff’s opinion. Darryl Sutter was an example of that. He didn’t like guys east of Winnipeg.

    Gare Joyce June 19, 2014 at 6:37 am Reply
    • Thanks for the comment!

      1. That’s one of, if not the biggest problem I have with the system. Methodologies and philosophies change quickly and dramatically. Tampa Bay might be the best example. I think few would disagree that they’ve been once of the best drafting teams in the recent years, but there in the bottom two of all four tables. It’s a big problem with the system that, at this point, I don’t see a fix for. Also, attaching the record of scouting directors is a great idea. Definitely something I’m going to look into and keep in mind. Thanks.

      2. So I’m assuming you’re saying that Churla means that Timmins has less say. I’m definitely interested in some sort of proof for this.

      3. Another solid point. I think it was a worthwhile inclusion, but like many things in this article, there are many other factors at work.

      Mitch Brown June 21, 2014 at 9:49 am Reply
  2. Hi Mitch,

    Great post and some very good analysis.

    I was wondering if you could produce some kind of weighing system based on what a team had to work with. So for example, if a team was consistently poor and had a high number of high #1 picks – it would stand to reason they would have a great chance for success.

    I know Scott Cullen has a weighing system (although his analysis is very flawed as it treats the draft as chance and does not take into account scouting ability i.e. Calgary, by definition, as an equal chance of producing a good #1 draft pick as any other team). But perhaps this could be used to weigh the expected likelihood of Timmins producing a good draft by a comparison to some kind of mean.

    Sam June 19, 2014 at 9:52 pm Reply
    • Thanks for the comment and the kind words Sam!

      I’m not much of statistician (as noted by my relatively simple tables and criteria), but it would be a worthwhile inclusion for sure. It’s certainly an idea that I would be interested in experimenting with. Also, I had no idea about Cullen’s system, I’ll have to look into it. Thanks for the insight!

      Mitch Brown June 21, 2014 at 9:53 am Reply
  3. Victor Hedman has played more games than Nick Tarnasky, so I’m not sure about your math…

    B Leonard June 21, 2014 at 11:17 pm Reply
    • I’m assuming this is what you’re talking about: “Surprisingly, Tampa Bay is second last; however, that can probably be explained by the fact that before Steven Stamkos (2008), the pick who played the second most NHL games was Nick Tarnasky.”

      Note that Hedman was selected in 2009 (AFTER Stamkos), while that excerpt clearly says “before Steven Stamkos” (as in selected in drafts before 2009). And for the record, the only TB draft pick selected between 2003 and 2007 who played more games than Tarnasky is Mike Lundin.

      Mitch Brown June 22, 2014 at 12:01 pm Reply
  4. Dont be conned by this Pro Timmins article, alot of his picks were given up by Montreal because they werent that good (ie Chipchura) for one..They are mostly 3rd and 4th liners and Nos 5-6 defensemen..Just look at how Montreals lineup is filled with other teams castoffs that we cant even give away..

    Marc C June 27, 2015 at 11:16 am Reply
  5. Hockey Inside Out site took a poll recently and asked fans are they pleased with the job Timmins has done in his 12 years in Montreal. Results were..

    No- 63%

    The Jackal June 27, 2015 at 11:18 am Reply
    • Do you like spamming under different names?

      Michael Gomez June 28, 2015 at 4:53 pm Reply
  6. What I fail to understand is if Timmins is so great, why did we have to go out and add Third and Fourth liners from opposing teams like Prust, Parenteau, Smith-Pelly. Weaver, Gilbert, Mitchell and Flynn?? You mean to tell us in Timmins Twelve years in Montreal, we can draft and develop our own 3rd and 4th liners. And you’re happy with that?

    HabinBurlington June 27, 2015 at 11:22 am Reply
  7. I have been a fan for almost two decades now, my husband even longer. Honestly, when I look at a team like Buffalo and what they have done in a year, so many young prospects and they add Jack Eichel, Ryan O’Reilly, they already have Girgensons and Sam Reinhart, do you realize those will be the Sabres starting centers shortly, while here in Montreal, we are stuck with soft players like Plekanec and Desharnais. So, No, I am not at all happy with Trevor Timmins.

    Samantha June 27, 2015 at 11:26 am Reply
  8. Most fans I talk to here in Montreal calls Timmins a “Hit or Mss’ scouting director, and I see alot more Misses than Hits. He is very overrated.

    Samantha June 27, 2015 at 11:32 am Reply
    • You’re posting as different people’s names with the same e-mail. Nice try.

      Michael Gomez June 28, 2015 at 4:52 pm Reply
  9. The facts show that the Drafted players by Timmkns have been horrible. Too soft, lack scoring and grit. In my opinion this is one of the main reasons why the Habs will miss the playoffs in 2015-16. Many of our top draft picks over the past decade have NOT had an impactful career at all!

    Steve February 4, 2016 at 3:00 pm Reply
  10. Look at who he has drafted since 92-93 and who he passed over. That is just the first and second round. Granted there were some years that the draft was weak but IMO he is not he guru some people make him out to be.

    habbernack April 30, 2017 at 10:54 am Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

five × 3 =

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Carey Price Deserves Better Than the Montreal Canadiens

It is needless to say that Carey Price is on a team that simply does not capitalize on his abilities. The Habs are on the verge of missing the playoffs for the third straight year. And while the injuries and bad calls are valid excuses for their current losing streak, there are plenty of errors […]

Share Button